Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:39
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Self-learning neural network cracks iconic black holes - Phys.org
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
HBO’s ‘Harry Potter’ Casts 9 More Roles, Including Draco Malfoy - The Hollywood Reporter
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
23andMe says 15% of customers asked to delete their genetic data since bankruptcy - TechCrunch
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Scientists Stunned as Rare Phenomenon Emerges from Arctic’s Icy Depths - Indian Defence Review
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
‘Death Stranding 2’ is Hideo Kojima at the peak of his powers - The Washington Post